5G Security Unveiled

Modern 5G security requires not just compliance, but threat-informed, automated testing. By integrating frameworks like MITRE FiGHT with advanced fuzzing solutions such as Penzzer, the industry can build more resilient, secure 5G networks that are ready for tomorrow's challenges.

Introduction

The fifth generation of cellular networks, 5G, is reshaping not just connectivity, but entire industries. Powering everything from autonomous vehicles to remote surgery, immersive AR/VR, and the rapidly expanding Internet of Things. But as 5G grows in scale and complexity, so do its risks and its attractiveness as a target for cyber adversaries.

How can researchers, operators, and vendors truly understand and secure this new digital backbone? The answer lies at the intersection of rigorous protocol analysis, actionable threat frameworks like MITRE FiGHT, and cutting-edge automated security testing platforms like Penzzer.

This post is your deep-dive guide to:

  • What 5G is and why it matters,
  • The key protocols, RFCs, and technical fields that define 5G systems,
  • How the MITRE FiGHT framework exposes the real and theoretical threats facing 5G,
  • And how Penzzer empowers the security community to turn threat intelligence into practical, automated defense - closing the gap between research and resilient deployments.

5G in Context: Why This Generation Matters

5G is far more than an incremental upgrade from 4G/LTE. Its new radio technology (NR), virtualized core networks, and "service-based" architecture are enabling critical infrastructure to move into the wireless domain for the first time.

Key 5G Benefits

  • Speed: Up to 10x faster than 4G, enabling high-bandwidth applications.
  • Latency: Ultra-low, enabling real-time control (e.g., remote industrial robots).
  • Device Density: Support for a million+ devices per square kilometer, key for IoT.
  • Reliability: Designed for mission-critical services - emergency, automotive, industrial.

5G Use Cases

  • Smart Cities: Autonomous vehicles, surveillance, connected traffic lights.
  • Healthcare: Remote surgery, health monitoring devices.
  • Industry 4.0: Wireless control of manufacturing robots and sensors.
  • Consumer: Streaming, VR/AR, gaming at new levels of quality.

But all this expansion means more to attack. New interfaces, protocols, and third-party integrations create new vulnerabilities - often in code or configurations that have never been tested at this scale.

5G Technical Foundations: Standards, RFCs, and Specifications

Who Defines 5G?

5G is unique in that its ecosystem is driven not by a single standards body, but by a collaboration between telecommunications, networking, and Internet communities.

Main Standards Bodies:

  • 3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project): The primary source for 5G technical specs (radio, core network, procedures).
  • IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force): Defines IP-based protocols and transport, often referenced by 5G specs.
  • ITU (International Telecommunication Union): Provides high-level frameworks for mobile technologies.

Key 3GPP Technical Specifications

  • 5G System Architecture:
    • TS 23.501: System architecture for the 5G System (5GS)
    • TS 23.502: Procedures for the 5G System
    • TS 29.571: Service Based Architecture APIs
  • 5G New Radio (NR):
  • Non-Access Stratum (NAS):

Relevant IETF RFCs

While 3GPP defines the mobile stack, it frequently relies on or references IETF standards for the underlying networking and security transport:

  • RFC 768: User Datagram Protocol (UDP)
  • RFC 791: Internet Protocol (IP)
  • RFC 8446: TLS 1.3 (used for SBA service security)
  • RFC 4271: BGP-4 (routing, sometimes used in 5G backhaul)

Inside the Protocols: Key Fields, Values, and Their Security Implications

To secure 5G, we must understand how its protocols work—and where their complexity can be abused. Let’s break down three essential protocol layers and their critical fields.

1. Radio Resource Control (RRC)

The RRC protocol is fundamental to the interaction between a device (UE) and the 5G radio network. It governs everything from device registration to mobility, security setup, and bearer management.

Key Fields:

  • Message Type: (RRCConnectionRequest, RRCConnectionSetup, RRCConnectionReconfiguration, etc.)
  • UE Identity: Randomly generated, can be temporary (S-TMSI) or persistent (IMSI).
  • Establishment Cause: (emergency, highPriorityAccess, mo-Signalling, etc.)

Security Implication:
Improper handling of message types or unexpected values in establishment cause can lead to denial of service or unauthorized network access. Attackers might exploit edge-case field values or unexpected message sequences.

2. Non-Access Stratum (NAS)

NAS sits between the user equipment (UE) and the core network, responsible for session management, authentication, and mobility.

Key Fields:

  • Message Type: (Registration Request, Authentication Request, Security Mode Command)
  • 5GS Registration Type: (initialRegistration, mobilityRegistrationUpdating)
  • Mobile Identity: (SUCI, GUTI, IMEISV)
  • Security Header Type: (Plain, Integrity protected, Ciphered)

Security Implication:
If an implementation mishandles unexpected message types or malformed mobile identity fields, attackers could bypass authentication, downgrade security, or trigger state confusion in the core.

3. GPRS Tunneling Protocol - User Plane (GTP-U)

GTP-U tunnels user data across the 5G core, linking radio and service gateways.

Key Fields:

  • Flags: E (Extension), S (Sequence), PN (N-PDU)
  • Message Type: (G-PDU, End Marker)
  • TEID: 32-bit Tunnel Endpoint ID

Security Implication:
Incorrect TEID handling can allow session hijacking, while flaws in flag parsing can trigger crashes or privilege escalation.

The Importance of Field Fuzzing

Each protocol field has a defined set of valid values - but often, security flaws are triggered by values that are:

  • Out-of-range,
  • Unexpectedly structured,
  • Or arrive in the wrong order or protocol state.

These are precisely the issues that modern fuzzers target, surfacing vulnerabilities that static analysis or conformance tests will miss.

The Threat Landscape: Introducing MITRE FiGHT for 5G

Traditional telecom security has relied on proprietary knowledge and vendor-specific incident reports. But with 5G, the attack surface is so broad—and the stakes so high—that the world needs a unified, open threat model. That’s where MITRE FiGHT comes in.

What Is MITRE FiGHT?

FiGHT™ (5G Hierarchy of Threats) is a comprehensive, open knowledge base of adversary Tactics and Techniques for 5G systems, curated by the MITRE Corporation. Modeled after the famous MITRE ATT&CK® framework, FiGHT catalogs how real or theoretical adversaries can compromise, disrupt, or exploit 5G networks.

FiGHT Technique Categories:

  • Theoretical: Based on academic literature or plausible analysis (not yet observed in the wild).
  • Proof of Concept (PoC): Demonstrated in labs or controlled settings.
  • Observed: Confirmed in real-world incidents.

Each technique is labeled by category, giving defenders clarity on what’s possible, what’s been demonstrated, and what’s already happening.

FiGHT's Structure and Tactics

Like ATT&CK, FiGHT is organized into Tactics (the "why") and Techniques (the "how"). Example tactics include:

  • Initial Access: Gaining entry into the network or service.
  • Execution: Running code or commands in the network.
  • Persistence: Maintaining a foothold.
  • Privilege Escalation: Gaining higher permissions.
  • Evasion: Avoiding detection.
  • Denial of Service: Disrupting service.

Techniques under these tactics span everything from SIM-jacking and signaling abuse, to protocol fuzzing and service API exploitation.

How FiGHT Powers 5G Security

FiGHT serves as the foundation for threat-informed defense in 5G, allowing security teams to:

  • Conduct structured threat assessments for any 5G deployment.
  • Drive adversarial emulation (red/purple team exercises) with 5G-relevant techniques.
  • Pinpoint security coverage gaps in products and processes.
  • Align investments in detection, prevention, and response with actual adversary behaviors.

Importantly: FiGHT is a living framework, evolving as new threats are discovered. MITRE invites contributions from the global telecom, research, and security communities.

Turning Threat Intelligence Into Action: How Penzzer Closes the Loop

Threat frameworks like FiGHT are only valuable if organizations can turn their intelligence into concrete, actionable testing. That’s where Penzzer delivers unique value.

How Penzzer Directly Addresses MITRE FiGHT Needs

Let’s map some of the top needs highlighted by FiGHT and show how Penzzer meets or exceeds them:

1. Threat Assessment With Realistic Testing

  • FiGHT Need: Understand where 5G implementations are vulnerable to both theoretical and observed attacks.
  • Penzzer Solution: Penzzer’s protocol-aware fuzzing systematically tests real 5G network elements, interfaces, and services against both common and esoteric threats - directly corresponding to FiGHT's catalog. This enables true, evidence-driven threat assessments, not just compliance checks.

2. Adversarial Emulation and Red Teaming

  • FiGHT Need: Simulate adversary behavior to validate defense and detection.
  • Penzzer Solution: With FiGHT-informed test modules, Penzzer can automate red-team-like activities, generating traffic and interactions that closely mirror attacker techniques described in FiGHT (e.g., malformed registration messages, rogue UE behavior, abuse of public APIs).

3. Coverage Gap Analysis

  • FiGHT Need: Identify untested or unprotected areas in the 5G threat landscape.
  • Penzzer Solution: Penzzer’s coverage metrics - when mapped to FiGHT tactics/techniques - show not just where testing has occurred, but where critical gaps remain. Security teams can prioritize efforts to cover all relevant FiGHT categories, ensuring no tactic is overlooked.

4. Continuous Security Validation

  • FiGHT Need: Keep pace with evolving threats and software updates.
  • Penzzer Solution: With support for CI/CD pipelines and regression tracking, Penzzer enables ongoing, automated validation against both existing and newly published FiGHT techniques. New test cases are easily mapped to new or updated FiGHT entries.

5. Community Collaboration and Intelligence Sharing

  • FiGHT Need: Open collaboration to improve the threat knowledge base.
  • Penzzer Solution: By exporting test cases, crash data, and fuzzing insights in standard formats, Penzzer allows security teams and researchers to contribute actionable intelligence back to the community - helping evolve FiGHT and improve collective resilience.

Additional Penzzer Features Tailored to FiGHT

  • Protocol Mutators Tuned to Real-World Techniques: Penzzer’s mutators can target not just random fields, but those highlighted in FiGHT as historically vulnerable.
  • Attack Surface Modeling: Model and test complex 5G deployments, including edge, MEC, and IoT device integration.
  • Observability and Analytics: Full visibility into which techniques have been exercised, what failures or anomalies were observed, and what evidence was collected.
  • Seamless Integration: Penzzer can connect with open-source 5G stacks (like Open5GS, srsRAN) or production-grade vendor systems for realistic testing environments.

The Unique Synergy: Threat-Informed Fuzzing

Penzzer operationalizes the "threat-informed defense" philosophy. While most fuzzers focus only on protocol conformance, Penzzer’s threat-aware fuzzing aligns with FiGHT to prioritize the highest-risk, most adversary-relevant scenarios. This means fewer wasted cycles and more impactful discoveries.

Practical Example: Fuzzing a 5G Registration Procedure, Step by Step

To illustrate how this threat-informed approach works in practice, let’s walk through how Penzzer could be used to test a 5G Registration procedure, a prime target in MITRE FiGHT.

1. Mapping the Threat

FiGHT Example Technique:
Exploit malformed NAS Registration Request to trigger state confusion or DoS.

  • Tactic: Initial Access / Denial of Service
  • Technique Type: Theoretical (documented in academic research), also observed in test environments.

2. Preparing the Test

  • Select Protocol: NAS (Non-Access Stratum)
  • Target Field: Registration Type, Mobile Identity, Security Header
  • Reference: 3GPP TS 24.501, FiGHT documentation

3. Fuzzing Process With Penzzer

  1. Protocol Modeling:
    Penzzer loads ASN.1-based NAS schema, understanding field types, ranges, and dependencies.
  2. Threat-Guided Mutation:
    • Penzzer applies targeted mutations to Registration Type (e.g., out-of-range values, reserved codes).
    • Crafts Mobile Identity fields with malformed lengths, encodings, or value overflows.
    • Varies Security Header values to test handling of improperly protected or ciphered messages.
  3. Stateful Testing:
    Penzzer simulates a realistic registration sequence, triggering not just isolated packet tests, but full session interactions.
  4. Integration With 5G Core Simulator:
    Connects to Open5GS or similar core, capturing how the system processes and reacts to each input.
  5. Monitoring and Detection:
    Penzzer watches for:
    • Unexpected reboots or crashes,
    • Error logs or protocol violations,
    • State machine confusion (e.g., stuck or invalid states),
    • Denial of Service (network stops responding).
  6. Result Correlation With FiGHT:
    • Any issues are mapped directly back to relevant FiGHT techniques (with clear reporting).
    • Test results can be exported for further analysis or shared with peers (helping close the feedback loop with MITRE and the security community).

4. Outcome

This approach reveals not just if a vulnerability exists, but which adversary behaviors it enables. Organizations can prioritize remediation, detection engineering, and incident response directly based on FiGHT's real-world threat modeling.

Looking Forward: Secure 5G With Threat-Informed Fuzzing

5G is a leap forward in technology and opportunity but also in complexity and risk. The traditional security playbook is no longer sufficient. Threats are evolving faster than ever, and attackers are innovating just as quickly as vendors.

By combining:

  • Comprehensive protocol understanding,
  • A living, open threat framework (MITRE FiGHT),
  • And automated, threat-aligned fuzz testing (Penzzer),

… the security community can finally keep pace.

Key Takeaways

  • 5G is foundational, not optional: The stakes are critical infrastructure, public safety, and economic competitiveness.
  • Threat modeling must be grounded in reality: MITRE FiGHT brings structure and community to 5G adversary intelligence.
  • Testing must be automated and threat-aware: Penzzer delivers on this promise, bridging theory and practice, ensuring testing is always relevant and impactful.
Other Post
Uncover Hidden Vulnerabilities

Identify security flaws before attackers do, automatically and at scale with Penzzer's intelligent fuzzing engine.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.