Introduction

RADIUS (Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service) remains a cornerstone of modern network access control, powering authentication, authorization, and accounting across enterprise networks. At the heart of the RADIUS workflow is the RADIUS client-typically an access point, VPN concentrator, or NAS device-that generates and processes various RADIUS packet types. Given the complexity and security sensitivity of these interactions, ensuring robust client-side handling is critical.

That's where Penzzer steps in.

‍

Penzzer's RADIUS Client-Side Fuzzer

Penzzer's fuzzing engine includes a dedicated client-side RADIUS fuzzer designed to probe how software and embedded systems generate, encode, and process outbound RADIUS packets. Instead of focusing on server-side parsing (as many tools do), Penzzer targets the logic that constructs these packets, an often overlooked attack surface.

Let's break down what Penzzer tests, and how it validates RADIUS client implementations against the full spectrum of protocol behaviors.

‍

Common Header Field Testing

Every RADIUS packet starts with a set of four mandatory header fields:

• Code
• Identifier
• Length
• Authenticator

Penzzer systematically mutates these fields to detect off-by-one errors, unvalidated assumptions, and implementation quirks in how clients construct outbound messages. For instance, it tests:

• Invalid or undefined Code values.
• Identifier collisions across concurrent sessions.
• Inconsistent Length values.
• Malformed or fixed-pattern Authenticator values.

Such mutations reveal logic bugs and potentially exploitable flaws in embedded RADIUS clients, including those used in IoT and telecom infrastructure.

‍

Integrity Validation: Message-Authenticator Handling

A critical security feature of RADIUS is the Message-Authenticator attribute, a cryptographic checksum that ensures the integrity and authenticity of the packet. Devices under test (DUTs) typically reject or silently drop any packet with an invalid or missing Message-Authenticator.

This is where many generic fuzzers fail.

An unintelligent fuzzer might modify packet contents arbitrarily without recalculating a valid Message-Authenticator. As a result, such packets never reach the code paths that matter, they are dropped at the earliest validation stage, and the fuzzer learns nothing.

Penzzer solves this by integrating protocol specific intelligence.

It dynamically recalculates Message-Authenticator values using the shared secret and correct packet encoding rules. This ensures that mutated packets are still valid from the DUT's perspective, enabling deep-path fuzzing and meaningful behavioral observation.

This capability dramatically increases test coverage and reduces false negatives.

‍

Access-Request Packet Testing

When testing Access-Request packets, Penzzer fuzzes attribute values such as:

• User-Name and User-Password: Encoding anomalies, null bytes, boundary issues.
• NAS-IP-Address: IPs in unexpected formats or reserved ranges.
• Calling/Called-Station-Id: Crafting identifiers with special characters, overflows, or mismatched types.

It also exercises the entire request pipeline by simulating retry behaviors and variations in service types (e.g., Login vs. Framed), uncovering how the client reacts to incomplete or malformed user metadata.

‍

Accounting-Request Packet Testing

For Accounting-Start, -Stop, and -Interim-Update packets, Penzzer fuzzes session-related attributes:

• Acct-Session-Id, Acct-Session-Time, Acct-Input/Output-Octets: Time and byte counters are tested for rollovers, sign errors, and unrealistic values.
• Acct-Terminate-Cause: Penzzer injects rarely used and undefined values to explore fallback logic and error handling.

This layer of fuzzing is essential in systems where session data drives billing or compliance logs.

‍

Access-Challenge & Multi-Step Flows

Penzzer verifies stateful behavior by testing how clients handle multi-step exchanges triggered by Access-Challenge responses. It manipulates attributes such as:

• State: Tries mismatched or tampered state values to test replay or confusion attacks.
• Reply-Message: Inserts malformed or injection-prone prompts.

Combined with timing variations and network fault injection, this reveals issues in how clients maintain and resume authentication state.

‍

Status-Server and Keepalive Testing

Clients use Status-Server packets to check server liveness. Penzzer ensures robustness in:

• Handling optional Message-Authenticator fields.
• Correctly retrying or failing over on no-response scenarios.
• Dealing with unexpected responses to status queries.

These tests are critical in high-availability environments where failover correctness is key.

‍

Compliance with ITSAR Requirements

The Indian Telecommunication Security Assurance Requirements (ITSAR) mandate rigorous testing of RADIUS implementations, particularly in telecom-grade infrastructure. ITSAR compliance ensures that network equipment and software are secure, interoperable, and resilient against known classes of protocol misuse.

Penzzer helps organizations meet ITSAR mandates by:

• Validating the correctness of all RADIUS packet types and attributes.
• Verifying proper implementation of cryptographic safeguards like the Message-Authenticator.
• Supporting automated, repeatable fuzzing campaigns aligned with certification workflows.

This ensures that vendors and operators can demonstrate full protocol coverage and security assurance, a key requirement for certification and deployment in Indian telecom networks.

‍

Why It Matters

Real-world vulnerabilities have historically stemmed from malformed RADIUS packets or incorrect client-side handling, including memory corruption, logic bugs, and session hijacking. Penzzer's RADIUS client-side fuzzing closes this gap by:

• Systematically covering protocol semantics.
• Ensuring cryptographic correctness (especially Message-Authenticator).
• Enabling continuous integration fuzzing for authentication workflows.
• Supporting industry-specific compliance such as ITSAR.