SSH - Secure Shell Protocol

Introduction: The Critical Role of SSH

In the modern era of distributed computing, remote management, and DevOps, Secure Shell (SSH) is arguably one of the most foundational protocols for secure remote administration. SSH has replaced legacy protocols like Telnet and rsh, offering strong encryption, authentication, and data integrity. It's a mainstay for system administrators, developers, DevOps teams, and anyone needing secure, remote access to servers and embedded devices.

However, SSH=s widespread deployment makes it a high-value target for attackers. Any flaw in an SSH implementation - whether in hardware, software, or embedded devices - can lead to catastrophic breaches, privilege escalation, or device takeover. That's why comprehensive, dynamic, and automated testing solutions are necessary for products using SSH.

In this blog post, we'll cover everything from SSH fundamentals and protocol design, to RFC definitions, to field-level details - culminating in how modern tools like Penzzer can automate, scale, and enhance security testing for any SSH-enabled device or application.

‍

What is SSH?

Secure Shell (SSH) is a cryptographic network protocol designed to securely operate network services over an unsecured network. Its primary application is remote command-line login and execution, but SSH is also the underpinning for secure file transfer (SCP, SFTP), tunneling, and port forwarding.

The key goals of SSH are:

• Confidentiality: Encrypting data in transit to prevent eavesdropping.
• Integrity: Ensuring that transmitted data cannot be tampered with.
• Authentication: Verifying the identity of users and systems.
• Forward secrecy: Compromising a session key doesn’t compromise prior sessions.

SSH works by establishing a secure channel between a client and server. It authenticates both parties, negotiates encryption keys, and then allows secure communication for shell access, file transfers, or even tunneling other protocols.

‍

The History and Evolution of SSH

SSH was invented in 1995 by Tatu Ylönen, in response to a password-sniffing attack at his university. SSH version 1 was widely adopted, but had security issues. The protocol evolved:

• SSH-1 (RFC 4251, historical): First-generation protocol, now considered obsolete due to several security flaws.
• SSH-2 (Current Standard): Completely redesigned protocol with improved security, modularity, and extensibility.

Today, SSH-2 is the only version in use, standardized and specified by multiple RFCs (Request for Comments).

‍

RFCs Defining the SSH Protocol

The SSH-2 protocol suite is defined by a core set of RFCs, published by the IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force). The primary ones include:

• RFC 4251: The Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol Architecture
• RFC 4252: The Secure Shell (SSH) Authentication Protocol
• RFC 4253: The Secure Shell (SSH) Transport Layer Protocol
• RFC 4254: The Secure Shell (SSH) Connection Protocol
• RFC 4250: The Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol Assigned Numbers
• RFC 4255: Using DNS to Securely Publish SSH Key Fingerprints
• RFC 4256: Generic Message Exchange Authentication for SSH
• RFC 4335, RFC 4462, RFC 5656, and others: Various extensions (e.g., GSS-API authentication, ECC keys, public key formats, etc.)

These documents collectively describe the protocol layers, message formats, authentication mechanisms, and extensibility.

‍

SSH Protocol Architecture: Layers and Their Roles

SSH-2 is architected in a modular way, with three main layers. Each layer encapsulates its own responsibilities and data structures.

1. Transport Layer Protocol (RFC 4253)

Responsible for:

• Server authentication
• Key exchange
• Encryption and integrity protection of all subsequent messages

2. User Authentication Protocol (RFC 4252)

Responsible for:

• Authenticating the client to the server
• Supporting multiple authentication methods (password, public key, GSS-API, etc.)

3. Connection Protocol (RFC 4254)

Responsible for:

• Multiplexing multiple logical "channels" (shell, exec, SFTP, port forwarding) over the secure tunnel

Diagram: SSH Protocol Layers

Each layer builds on the secure foundation provided by the previous.

‍

SSH Protocol Fields and Their Possible Values

Let’s break down the key protocol fields at each layer, as defined in the RFCs, and discuss what values these can take. This deep-dive is essential for both implementers and security testers, as flaws in field handling are a common source of vulnerabilities.

‍

Transport Layer Protocol (RFC 4253)

This is the foundation of SSH, responsible for the initial handshake and securing all higher-level communication.

Key Fields

1. Protocol Version Exchange
   • Example: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_9.3
   • Field: SSH-<protoversion>-<softwareversion> [comments]
   • protoversion: “1.99” (compatibility), or “2.0”
   • softwareversion: ASCII, max 255 chars
   • Comments: optional
2. Key Exchange Initialization (KEXINIT message)
   • Field: Algorithm name-lists for:
     • Key exchange methods (e.g., diffie-hellman-group14-sha256)
     • Server host key algorithms (e.g., rsa-sha2-256, ecdsa-sha2-nistp256)
     • Encryption algorithms (e.g., aes128-ctr, chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com)
     • MAC algorithms (e.g., hmac-sha2-256)
     • Compression algorithms (e.g., none, zlib)
     • Languages (rarely used)
   • Value: comma-separated list of names (per RFC 4250)
3. Algorithm Negotiation
   • SSH chooses the first algorithm supported by both sides in each list.
   • Each side lists its preferences, which may differ.
4. Key Exchange (KEX messages)
   • Fields: Key exchange messages vary by algorithm (e.g., KEXDH_INIT, KEXDH_REPLY)
   • Values: Key material, signatures, etc.
5. Service Request (SERVICE_REQUEST and SERVICE_ACCEPT)
   • Field: Service name (e.g., ssh-userauth, ssh-connection)
   • Values: ASCII string
6. Disconnect and Ignore Messages
   • Fields: Reason code (integer), description (string)

‍

User Authentication Protocol (RFC 4252)

This layer authenticates the client to the server.

Key Fields

1. Authentication Request (SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_REQUEST)
   • Fields:
     • user name: ASCII
     • service name: e.g., ssh-connection
     • auth method: e.g., password, publickey, keyboard-interactive
     • Method-specific fields (password, public key, signature, etc.)
2. Authentication Response (SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_SUCCESS, SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_FAILURE)
   • Fields:
     • Allowed methods (comma-separated list)
     • Partial success indicator
3. Public Key Authentication
   • Fields:
     • Key algorithm
     • Public key blob (binary)
     • Signature

‍

Connection Protocol (RFC 4254)

This is where the real work happens: executing remote commands, managing shells, file transfers, etc.

Key Fields

1. Channel Open (SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_OPEN)
   • Fields:
     • Channel type (e.g., session, x11, direct-tcpip)
     • Sender channel (uint32)
     • Initial window size (uint32)
     • Maximum packet size (uint32)
     • Type-specific data
2. Channel Requests
   • Fields:
     • Request type (e.g., shell, exec, pty-req, env)
     • Boolean "want reply"
     • Type-specific parameters
3. Channel Data
   • Fields:
     • Channel number
     • Data (binary)
4. Global Requests
   • Fields:
     • Request type (e.g., tcpip-forward)
     • Boolean "want reply"
     • Type-specific parameters
5. Channel Close and EOF
   • Simple control messages

‍

Field Value Ranges and Constraints

• Most fields have protocol-specified size limits (e.g., strings: max 255 chars, uint32 fields for channel numbers, etc.)
• Some fields (like user names, key material) are arbitrary length, bounded by implementation-specific limits.

This complex, extensible field structure is both a source of SSH's flexibility and a challenge for security - incorrect parsing, validation, or memory handling in any field can lead to vulnerabilities.

‍

Real-World Vulnerabilities and the Need for Dynamic Security Testing

SSH has been the focus of security research for decades, and both client and server implementations have suffered from severe vulnerabilities, such as:

• Memory safety issues (buffer overflows, heap corruptions)
• Logic errors (authentication bypass, improper key handling)
• Protocol misinterpretation (downgrade attacks, bad negotiation)
• Poor error handling (crashes or information leaks on malformed inputs)
• Race conditions (channel handling)

‍

While open-source implementations like OpenSSH are widely reviewed, many commercial, embedded, or proprietary SSH stacks are not. Further, any modification - even small config changes - can introduce subtle bugs.

‍

Why Static Analysis Alone Is Not Enough

• Source code scanners miss implementation bugs in binary-only, black-box products.
• Large codebases often generate excessive false positives, leading to alert fatigue.
• Real-world vulnerabilities often lurk in protocol parsing logic, which static analysis can’t fully explore.

Dynamic, black-box fuzzing - that is, sending of crafted, unexpected, or semi-valid protocol messages to a target and observing the response - is the most direct way to find these bugs in practice.

‍

How Penzzer Revolutionizes SSH Security Testing

Black-Box Fuzzing Explained

Black-box fuzzing involves testing a system without any knowledge of its internal implementation. Instead, the fuzzer interacts with the product as an external user would - sending protocol messages, receiving responses, and detecting failures or anomalous behavior.

Penzzer takes this approach to the next level:

• No source code required: Works on closed-source, binary-only, or third-party SSH implementations.
• Smart Fuzzing: Rather than sending random or known-bad inputs, Penzzer dynamically generates inputs most likely to reveal flaws, prioritizing paths with the highest failure probability.
• Enterprise scalability: Test millions of input permutations, uncovering deep, rare bugs.
• Automated reporting: Only real, exploitable failures are reported - minimizing false positives.

Penzzer is designed for both enterprise QA and security research, and is used by certification labs and procurement authorities worldwide.

‍

Testing SSH-Able Devices with Penzzer

The versatility of SSH means that products might implement it in various roles:

• As an SSH Server: Accepting connections from SSH clients for remote administration.
• As an SSH Client: Initiating connections to servers, such as in automated file transfers, device orchestration, or remote backups.

‍

Penzzer can test both directions:

1. Penzzer as an SSH Client (Testing SSH Servers)

Penzzer simulates a client connecting to your SSH server. The process is:

• Initiate connections with millions of protocol version strings, including malformed, truncated, or overlong identifiers.
• Negotiate every permutation of key exchange, encryption, MAC, and compression algorithms, including boundary cases and deprecated/unknown algorithms.
• Fuzz the authentication protocol, sending malformed or incomplete credentials, invalid key blobs, and non-standard authentication requests.
• Open dozens of multiplexed channels, sending requests in unexpected orders or with malformed parameters.
• Observe server responses for:
  • Crashes (process, service, or device)
  • Memory corruptions (detectable via instrumentation, if available)
  • Protocol violations (violations of RFC 425x standards)
  • Logic flaws (e.g., authentication bypass, privilege escalation)

Result: Every potential input - valid, semi-valid, or deliberately broken - can be tested, identifying real-world vulnerabilities before attackers can exploit them.

‍

2. Penzzer as an SSH Server (Testing SSH Clients)

Conversely, Penzzer can act as an SSH server, and your device/software acts as the client. This tests:

• How the client parses and handles server version strings, including edge cases and non-standard banners.
• Client robustness against malformed key exchange and authentication sequences.
• Response to receiving unsupported algorithms, incorrect server host keys, or protocol extensions.
• Handling of abnormal or unexpected connection protocol behaviors (e.g., channel requests, forwarding).
• Client-side error handling: Does it crash, hang, or leak sensitive info when faced with protocol violations?

This is critical for embedded devices, automated backup systems, and orchestrators, which often run headless SSH clients in the field.

Bidirectional Testing: With both client and server roles supported, Penzzer covers every use case - servers, clients, or products that implement both.

‍

Case Study: Penzzer in Action

Example: Securing an Embedded Router’s SSH Daemon

A major router manufacturer needs to certify their SSH-enabled management interface before shipping to millions of customers. The device is closed-source, and their in-house testing can’t scale to every possible input.

• Setup: Penzzer is configured as a fuzzing client targeting the router’s SSH port.
• Testing: Millions of dynamic protocol permutations are sent - covering every RFC field, value boundary, and malformed input.
• Findings: Penzzer discovers:
  • A buffer overflow when parsing an overlong algorithm list in KEXINIT.
  • A crash when handling a malformed CHANNEL_OPEN request.
  • Incorrect error handling on authentication failure (server leaks stack trace info).

The development team fixes these issues. Retesting with Penzzer confirms the fixes and ensures no regressions are introduced.

‍

Example: Verifying a Custom SSH Client for Secure Backups

A financial services company builds a proprietary SSH client to automate backups to a secure server farm.

• Setup: Penzzer acts as the SSH server, presenting every protocol permutation possible.
• Testing: The custom client is exercised against unexpected banners, malformed packets, and protocol edge cases.
• Findings: Penzzer uncovers:
  • Client crash when receiving a truncated key exchange message.
  • Authentication bypass on a specific malformed public key.

Both vulnerabilities are patched before production deployment.

‍

Advantages Over Static Analysis and Traditional Fuzzing

Why is Penzzer's approach superior?

• No Source Required: Fuzzes binary-only, proprietary, or black-box products.
• Extensive Coverage: Dynamically generates millions of test cases, covering edge cases missed by signature-based tools.
• Low False Positives: Reports only real failures (crashes, protocol violations, actual successful attacks).
• Testing Proprietary Extensions: Penzzer's flexible protocol engine supports fuzzing even proprietary or undocumented SSH protocol extensions.
• Continuous Integration: Fits into CI/CD pipelines for ongoing, automated security assurance.

Unlike many legacy fuzzers, which simply replay known-bad inputs, Penzzer learns and adapts during testing, maximizing its bug-finding efficiency.